Current:Home > FinanceArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Thrive Capital Insights
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-25 09:46:21
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (97)
Related
- Carolinas bracing for second landfall from Tropical Storm Debby: Live updates
- Hats off to an illuminating new documentary about Mary Tyler Moore
- Pregnant Rihanna Has a Perfectly Peachy Date Night With A$AP Rocky in Milan
- Wes Anderson has outdone himself with 'Asteroid City'
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- A Utah school district has removed the Bible from some schools' shelves
- How Hailie Jade’s Fiancé Evan Asked Eminem for His Blessing to Get Engaged
- In 'American Born Chinese,' a beloved graphic novel gets Disney-fied
- PHOTO COLLECTION: AP Top Photos of the Day Wednesday August 7, 2024
- Hayden Panettiere's Family Reveals Jansen Panettiere's Cause of Death
Ranking
- A New York Appellate Court Rejects a Broad Application of the State’s Green Amendment
- In Defense of Boring Bachelor Zach Shallcross
- Dwyane Wade's Daughter Zaya Granted Legal Name and Gender Change
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend reading, listening and viewing
- 51-year-old Andy Macdonald puts on Tony Hawk-approved Olympic skateboard showing
- Three great songs for your next road trip
- Iran nuclear program: U.S. and allies grapple with IAEA revelation of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade
- Transcript: Former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan on Face the Nation, March 5, 2023
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Celebrate Christina Applegate's SAG Awards Nomination With an Ode to Her Unforgettable Roles
These are the winners of this year's James Beard Awards, the biggest night in food
The 47 Most Popular Amazon Items E! Readers Bought This Month
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Last Day to Get $90 Worth of Olaplex For $38 and Save 30% on Peter Thomas Roth, Murad, Elemis, and More
This Parent Trap Reunion At the 2023 SAG Awards Will Have You Feeling Nostalgic
Family Karma: See Every Photo From Amrit Kapai and Nicholas Kouchoukos' Wedding