Current:Home > MarketsHouse Republicans seek documents from White House over Biden's involvement in Hunter Biden's refusal to comply with congressional subpoena -Thrive Capital Insights
House Republicans seek documents from White House over Biden's involvement in Hunter Biden's refusal to comply with congressional subpoena
View
Date:2025-04-13 21:46:54
Washington — The Republican leaders of the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees on Wednesday asked the White House to turn over information about President Biden's alleged involvement in his son Hunter Biden's decision not to comply with a congressional subpoena for a deposition, expanding its impeachment inquiry into the president.
In a letter to White House counsel Edward Siskel, Reps. James Comer and Jim Jordan requested documents and communications between White House staff in the Executive Office of the President and Hunter Biden or his lawyers regarding his scheduled deposition, which was supposed to happen on Dec. 13.
But Hunter Biden defied the subpoena from the Oversight Committee for a closed-door interview with lawmakers, appearing briefly outside the U.S. Capitol to reiterate that he would answer questions only in a public setting.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters later that day that the president was "familiar with" what his son was going to say in his statement.
"In light of Ms. Jean-Pierre's statement, we are compelled to examine the involvement of the President in his son's scheme to defy the Committees' subpoenas," Comer, who leads the Oversight Committee, and Jordan, chairman of the Judiciary panel, said in their letter to Siskel.
They argued that Jean-Pierre's remark suggests that Mr. Biden "had some amount of advanced knowledge" that Hunter Biden would refuse to comply with the subpoena for testimony.
The Republicans set a Jan. 10 deadline for the White House to provide the records regarding Hunter Biden's deposition. They are also seeking documents from staff in the Executive Office of the President related to a comment Mr. Biden made on Dec. 6 denying that he interacted with his son and brother's foreign business associates.
Comer and Jordan said the president's "advanced awareness" that his son would not answer questions from lawmakers behind closed doors "raises a troubling new question that we must examine: whether the President corruptly sought to influence or obstruct the Committees' proceeding by preventing, discouraging, or dissuading his son from complying with the Committees' subpoenas."
"Such conduct could constitute an impeachable offense," they wrote.
Beyond Jean-Pierre's comment, it's unclear how much Mr. Biden knew about his son's plan not to appear for the deposition. Hunter Biden told reporters on Dec. 13 that he would answer at a public hearing "any legitimate questions" from Comer and Oversight Committee members, and accused the GOP leaders of the three committees conducting the impeachment inquiry of "distorting the facts."
Republicans have been investigating Hunter Biden's foreign business dealings for nearly a year and claim Mr. Biden was enriched by his son and brother's overseas work and accepted bribes. They have produced no evidence of wrongdoing by the president or that he benefited financially from his family's business ventures.
Still, then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced in September that he would be launching a formal impeachment inquiry into the president, and the House's GOP majority voted earlier this month to formalize the probe.
Comer and Jordan said they will pursue proceedings to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress for defying the subpoena from Republicans.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (62959)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 6 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $398 million
- Trump's 'stop
Ranking
- Blake Lively’s Inner Circle Shares Rare Insight on Her Life as a Mom to 4 Kids
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Recommendation
Kehlani Responds to Hurtful Accusation She’s in a Cult
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Average rate on 30
Average rate on 30